SC declines contempt pleas over bulldozer demolitions, asks victims to approach High Courts

The Supreme Court has declined to entertain contempt petitions alleging violations of its guidelines on so-called "bulldozer demolitions" and directed affected individuals to seek relief from the respective High Courts.

A Bench observed that High Courts are better placed to examine the facts of individual demolition cases and determine whether authorities have violated the law or the Supreme Court's directions.

The apex court had, in its landmark November 2024 judgment, laid down nationwide guidelines requiring authorities to issue prior notice, provide an opportunity to be heard and follow due process before carrying out demolitions.

It also warned that officials who violated these directions could face contempt proceedings and other legal consequences.

While refusing to directly hear the fresh contempt pleas, the Supreme Court clarified that aggrieved persons remain free to move the jurisdictional High Courts, which can examine the legality of demolition actions and grant appropriate relief.

The order reinforces the role of High Courts as the first forum for addressing alleged violations while ensuring that the Supreme Court's due process guidelines continue to govern demolition drives across the country.