Prime Minister Narendra Modi is rooting for the Uniform Civil Code, but is it actually feasible?

The Prime Minister has once again made a strong pitch for implementing a uniform civil code in the country. He recently reiterated his views on the subject, saying a country cannot function when there are two sets of laws and that it was sanctioned in the Constitution itself. This in fact opens a Pandora's box as this topic is sure to generate a lot of heat and arguments. The recent proposition by the Prime Minister for a uniform civil code has ignited a contentious debate within our society. While the concept of a uniform set of laws for all citizens might seem appealing at first, it is crucial to examine its potential ramifications. We must carefully consider the implications of such a code, particularly on personal rights and cultural diversity of minority communities. The protection and preservation of individual rights and cultural autonomy should always take precedence over any drive towards uniformity. In the first place, the Prime Minister has always been in favour of one nation, one election, one leader, one party and what-have-you. But this is not such a great idea for a diverse country like ours. Plurality is what makes the Indian democracy work. If it were not for the system's flexibility, it would have crashed long back. Interestingly, the country does have a uniform civil code; only personal laws such as marriage are governed separately. Even if you had a uniform civil code, you would have to give latitude to regional and cultural differences.

Any diverse and pluralistic society thrives when it recognises and respects the individual rights of its citizens. The idea of a uniform civil code may seem egalitarian on the surface, but it must not be pursued at the cost of compromising people's personal rights. Our Constitution guarantees the freedom to practice and uphold one's cultural and religious beliefs but the introduction of a uniform civil code erases these differences as these are a direct infringement on such fundamental rights. India's diversity has been the bedrock of our nation, fostering tolerance and inclusivity. A uniform civil code threatens to homogenise this rich cultural tapestry and suppress the unique identity of minority communities. Personal laws, shaped by religious and cultural practices, have played a crucial role in safeguarding the rights and interests of minority communities. These laws have evolved organically, considering the specific needs and aspirations of these communities. Imposing a uniform civil code would risk negating these protections and imposing a one-size-fits-all approach, which may not adequately address the concerns of all citizens. Therefore, rather than imposing a uniform civil code, the focus should be on fostering dialogue and understanding among different communities. It is through open conversations and mutual respect that we can bridge the treacherous gaps and find common ground. Collaboration and consensus-building should be the guiding principle as we work towards creating a just society that respects individual rights while cherishing our diversity. Maybe we need to ultimately go down this path, but let's find another way.