Was almost declared corrupt by you, won’t get justice: Kejriwal tells Justice Sharma, seeking her recusal

Former chief minister Arvind Kejriwal on Monday told Delhi High Court judge Swarana Kanta Sharma that her earlier decisions in the liquor policy cases “almost declared” him guilty and corrupt, and that he apprehends he would not get justice if she continues to hear CBI’s plea against his discharge.

Appearing before Justice Sharma to argue his application seeking her to withdraw from the case, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) convenor contended that under the law on recusal, the question is not of a judge’s integrity or uprightness, but of “reasonable bias” in the mind of the litigant.

Kejriwal claimed that, except for the CBI’s petition and one other case involving a political opponent of the BJP, no other case before Justice Sharma was being heard at the same “speed” and there was a “trend” of the court “endorsing” the investigating agencies’ arguments. He submitted that on the first day of the hearing on March 9, the court “neutralised” the discharge order, which was passed by the trial judge after day-to-day arguments of over three months, by passing a “sweeping, ex parte order” in haste in violation of principles of natural justice.

On February 27, the trial court discharged Kejriwal, Sisodia and 21 others and pulled up the CBI, saying its case was wholly unable to survive judicial scrutiny and stood discredited in its entirety.

On March 9, Justice Sharma issued notice to all 23 accused on CBI’s plea against their discharge, saying certain observations and findings of the trial court at the stage of framing of charges prima facie appeared erroneous and needed consideration.

She also stayed the trial court’s recommendation on the initiation of departmental action against the CBI’s investigating officer in the liquor policy case.

 Kejriwal said that Justice Sharma had earlier denied relief to him on his petition challenging his arrest, as well as bail pleas by other accused, including Manish Sisodia and K Kavitha, and also made “strong and conclusive” findings.

He also objected to Justice Sharma attending four functions organised by the Akhil Bharatiya Adhivakta Parishad. He contended that being an ideological opponent of the BJP and RSS, he apprehended that the judge “sympathised” with their ideology and that he would not receive justice.

As Justice Sharma asked Kejriwal if she had made any ideological or political statements in the events, the AAP chief said her attendance was enough.

Kejriwal also alleged that Justice Sharma has a conflict of interest in the case.

He concluded arguments on his recusal application.