When a high-profile murder occurs, it sends shockwaves through society. The immediate reaction is one of fear, anger, and uncertainty. People look to the police for answers, but law enforcement often finds itself caught in a complex web of pressure. Every move they make is scrutinized, and any delay or mistake fuels suspicions of bias or inefficiency. The police, facing the strain of maintaining law and order, struggle to balance public expectations with the need for a thorough and fair investigation. A rushed response could lead to errors, while delays lead to accusations of negligence or favouritism.
The recent murder of BJP leader Anil Tiger in Kanke, Ranchi, illustrated this pattern vividly. As soon as news of the killing spread, emotions ran high, and political tensions escalated. Protests erupted across the city, with opposition leaders blaming the government for failing to maintain law and order. The demand for justice quickly turned into a political battleground, where different groups tried to use the incident to further their own agendas. Instead of ensuring peace and stability, many senior politicians, including some holding very responsible positions in the government, were seen actively participating in dharnas and bandhs, adding to the unrest rather than controlling it.
For the media, a sensational murder is more than just a news story—it is an opportunity. News channels flood their broadcasts with dramatic coverage, sometimes prioritizing high viewership over responsible journalism. In Anil Tiger’s case, speculation and conspiracy theories take center stage, often overshadowing factual reporting. While responsible journalism can help uncover the truth and bring justice, sensationalized reporting only deepens public anger and spreads misinformation, making the situation harder to control.
Caught in the middle of this chaos are ordinary citizens. For them, life comes to a sudden halt. Streets turn into protest zones, businesses remain closed, and public transport is disrupted. The worst-hit are daily wage workers and small business owners, whose survival depends on their ability to work each day. In Ranchi, following Anil Tiger’s murder, the impact was severe—shops remained shut, public movement was restricted, and the city came to a standstill for a few hours. Cases of arson on the road were also reported escalating tensions and endangering public safety. Ambulances carrying critically ill patients got trapped in protest-induced traffic jams, leading to tragic and unnecessary losses. An atmosphere of uncertainty gripped the city. The very people whom these protests claim to represent ended up suffering the most.
Economically, the consequences are harsh. A single day of shutdown results in massive financial setbacks, delaying supply chains and creating an atmosphere of economic instability.
While such sensational incidents cannot always be avoided given the complexities of society, their fallout can be managed better. Every stakeholder has a responsibility. The police must conduct swift yet impartial investigations, use forensic science and institutional accountability to ensure credibility. Political leaders must rise above partisan gains and prioritize peace, urging restraint instead of chaos. The media must report responsibly, ensuring facts are presented without exaggeration or fear mongering. Civil society should provide platforms for peaceful dialogue and legal action rather than endorsing disruptive protests. The judiciary must deliver timely justice; ensuring people do not feel the need to take matters into their own hands.
A growing wave of public disillusionment is becoming evident. People are increasingly frustrated with bandhs and dharnas that disrupt lives, stall economic progress, and fail to bring real justice. The reality is that these chaotic protest methods benefit politicians more than the public. It is time we move past disruptive protests and adopt more constructive and responsible ways to address grievances. True justice does not come from roadblocks and shutdowns—it comes from a well-functioning legal system and a society that values order over chaos. Until then, the cycle of disruption and suffering will continue.
The writer is former-DGP, Jharkhand. Views are personal.
