SC says no to physical presence of Yasin Malik in J and K court

| | New Delhi
1 2 3 4 5
  • 0

SC says no to physical presence of Yasin Malik in J and K court

Saturday, 05 April 2025 | Pioneer News Service | New Delhi

The Supreme Court on Friday refused the physical production of jailed JKLF chief Yasin Malik before a Jammu court but allowed him to cross-examine witnesses in a couple of cases through the virtual mode.

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan observed the Centre’s order of December 2024 under Section 303 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act restricting his movement from the NCT of Delhi for a year. The bench, therefore, found Malik’s physical production inappropriate in light of the prohibitory order. The order came in the matter where CBI sought transfer of the trials in the 1989 case of the kidnapping of Rubaiya Sayeed, daughter of former union minister Mufti Mohammed Sayeed, and the 1990 Srinagar shootout case, from Jammu to New Delhi. The CBI’s plea before the court challenged the September 20, 2022 order of a Jammu trial court directing lifer Malik to be produced before it physically to cross-examine prosecution witnesses in the abduction case. The CBI said he was a threat to the national security and couldn’t be allowed to be taken outside the Tihar jail premises.

The top court also took into account the reports filed by the Delhi High Court registrar (IT) the registrar general of the Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh High Court on the availability of the video-conferencing facilities in Tihar jail and Jammu, respectively. The top court noted the Jammu sessions court was “well-equipped” with the virtual system.

It recorded Malik’s submission that he did not want to engage a lawyer for cross-examining the witnesses.

The top court observed Section 530 of the BNSS says trials, inquiries, and proceedings, including the issuance, service, and execution of summons and warrants, can be held in electronic mode, using electronic communication or audio-video means.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted that Malik was a security risk and cannot be taken to the Jammu court physically. The top court had previously directed the registrar general of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court to ensure proper video-conferencing facilities at the Jammu special court while hearing two cases against Malik and others.

Trending News

more

Sunday Edition

A Traveller’s Diary Through Vibrant Vietnam

06 April 2025 | Rohit Kaul | Agenda

The unwanted becomes unforgettable

06 April 2025 | SAKSHI PRIYA | Agenda

Taste of Burmese celebrations in India

06 April 2025 | Abhi Singhal | Agenda

Cool, Creamy and Irresistible

06 April 2025 | Abhi Singhal | Agenda

Find Your Perfect Summer Cool-Down

06 April 2025 | SAKSHI PRIYA | Agenda

Hiking to the heights

06 April 2025 | Abhi Singhal | Agenda

A Traveller’s Diary Through Vibrant Vietnam

06 April 2025 | Rohit Kaul | Agenda

The unwanted becomes unforgettable

06 April 2025 | SAKSHI PRIYA | Agenda