A touchy legal journey looms ahead with Allahabad HC allowing a survey to settle Shahi Idgah dispute

In the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi case, the Allahabad High Court has granted permission for the appointment of an advocate commissioner to survey the Shahi Idgah in Mathura. It is in response to the petitioners' assertion that the mosque, in close vicinity of Krishna Janmabhoomi, contains artefacts indicating its past as a Hindu temple. The High Court's decision to allow the Gyanvapi-style survey of Shahi Idgah arises from a protracted dispute between the Hindu and Muslim communities regarding the ownership and origin of the site and has the potential to reignite passions. The objective of the court is to arrive at an informed and impartial decision based on historical records and archaeological findings. The Shahi Idgah, located near the Krishna Janmabhoomi has been a focal point of dispute for decades. Both Hindu and Muslim communities have presented historical evidence supporting their respective claims, and the survey aims to unravel the historical background of Shahi Idgah. While legal proceedings are crucial for amicably resolving disputes, the politicisation of religious issues carries severe consequences for communal harmony.

The larger issue at the moment is not who is right and will win the case but its implications on the social fabric of our nation. Given the fact that general elections are round the corner and the Ram temple is likely to be inaugurated in January, the chances of overwhelming religious sentiment polarising the electorate are rather high. The court may have the duty and right to dispense legal recourse but we all know that it does pose a risk of inflaming communal tension and chaos. It was indeed a decision of the same court that resulted in the opening of the Ram temple in Ayodhya. The Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi is still a bone of contention; Mathura only adds to the charged sentiment. The dangers associated with communal politics are many. It heightens religious sensitivities, creating an environment where communities feel threatened or marginalised. This heightened tension can lead to protests, violence and an overall disruption of the social fabric. Communal politics fosters polarisation and division among communities. This division undermines the rich cultural and social diversity that has been a defining feature of India's pluralistic society. Then there is a high chance of political interference in legal matters which can complicate the resolution process. It may influence public opinion and put undue pressure on the judiciary, potentially compromising the impartiality of legal decisions. We are already going through challenging times where society is getting polarised. It is crucial for all stakeholders, including political leaders, to approach this issue with sensitivity and responsibility. Prioritising dialogue, understanding and respect for diversity is essential to ensure lasting communal harmony. In the pursuit of justice, it is imperative to avoid actions that may inadvertently exacerbate religious tensions and sow the seeds of discord among citizens of our great nation.