A parliamentary panel examining the Waqf Amendment bill on Wednesday adopted by a majority vote its report that contained changes suggested by ruling BJP members, prompting the Opposition to dub the exercise as an attempt to destroy the Waqf boards.
The Joint Committee of Parliament (JPC) on the Waqf (Amendment) bill, chaired by BJP member Jagdambika Pal, adopted the report on the draft legislation by a 15-11 majority vote. Opposition members were submitting dissent notes to the report.
Opposition members objected to the proposed omission of the 'waqf by user' clause in the Waqf Amendment Bill, contending that the provision existed since time immemorial.
In a dissent note to the report, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi said the last-minute inclusion of the proviso to the clause omitting 'waqf by user' was "wholly unhelpful" as the principle will only be tested in cases where the property is placed 'in dispute', in which case the proviso will not apply.
BJP members insisted that the bill, introduced in Lok Sabha in August last year, seeks to bring modernity, transparency and accountability in the management of Waqf properties, while the Opposition termed it as an attack on the constitutional rights of the Muslim community and interference in the functioning of the Waqf boards.
Speaking to reporters after the 38th sitting of the committee, Pal said the report will be presented to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Thursday and tabled in both Houses of Parliament during the Budget Session beginning Friday.
A key concern of the Opposition was the appointment of non-Muslims on the Waqf Board, which they claimed was violative of Article 26 of the Constitution that granted citizens freedom to manage their religious affairs, including establishment and maintenance of institutions for religious and charitable purposes.
"You have violated our rights granted under Article 26 of the Constitution. You talked about Uniform Civil Code, but there are Hindu Endowment Board, Sikh Boards, Christian boards, which do not have non-Hindus, non-Sikhs, and non-Christians as members. But why does this not extend to Muslims? This is an attempt to destroy the Waqf Boards," Congress member Imran Masood told reporters.
At its meeting on Monday, the committee had adopted 14 amendments to the bill, all proposed by BJP members and rejected every change suggested by the opposition members, including the Congress, the DMK, the TMC, the AAP, the Shiv Sena-UBT and the AIMIM. Trinamool leader Kalyan Banerjee claimed the observations and recommendations of the committee were "wholly perverse".
BJP members contended that the amendments suggested by the Opposition were intended to uphold the 1995 law and negate the spirit of the Waqf Amendment bill-2024.
"All these amendments are not in the interest of the Waqf. These will destroy the Waqf board and increase interference of the Central government in their functioning," AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi said.
He said the evacuee properties could also be taken over by the government. "This will not be acceptable to the masses, especially the Muslim community. We reject this Waqf amendment. Muslims will lose their masjids," Owaisi said.
According to the amendments accepted by the committee, the state Waqf boards will now include one member from the Muslim OBC community, ensuring broader representation.
It also has provisions that allow the state government to establish separate Waqf boards for Aghakhani and Bohra communities and safeguard women's inheritance rights in Waqf Alal Aulad (family waqfs).
The amendments also allow the income from Waqf Alal Aulad to support widows, divorced women, and orphans, if specified by the waqif (creator of the waqf).
Pal said many of the amendments approved by the committee have addressed several concerns of Opposition members as well, adding the Bill once enacted will help Waqf board in discharging its duties transparently and more effectively.
For the first time, "pasmanda" (backward) Muslims, the poor, women and orphans have been included among beneficiaries of the Waqf, an endowment made by Muslims for charitable religious purposes, he said.
The committee held 38 meetings in the national Capital since its constitution on August 8 last year and toured several state capitals to consult stake holders. "This report is a significant document that empowers the Muslim community," BJP member Tejasvi Surya said.
DMK's A Raja said the draft report was circulated among the 31-member committee late Tuesday night and members got very little time to peruse the voluminous document.
While the adopted bill accepts the government's stand of removing the "Waqf by user" clause in the existing law, it has added that no cases will be reopened against such properties on a retrospective basis provided these are not in dispute or belong to the government.
The report made it clear that the provisions to omit the 'Waqf by user' definition of a Waqf property will be with prospective effect.
It has also endorsed the government's move to include non-Muslims in Waqf boards, saying they can be "beneficiaries, parties to disputes, or otherwise interested in Waqf matters".
It, however, does away with the enquiry power vested with the district collector concerned in cases of disputes with the government, giving the authority to the state government to designate an officer senior to the collector to probe the matter. Seeking to allay fears that the existing waqf properties will be subject to scrutiny after the amended waqf law comes into force, the parliamentary panel had recommended that no cases will be reopened against such properties on a retrospective basis, provided the asset is not in dispute or belongs to the government.
"Any bad-faith actor can institute a litigation over any part of the properties belonging to the 'waqf by user' and consequently prevent it from seeking any protection under the amended Act," Congress member Gaurav Gogoi said in his dissent note.
Gogoi, the deputy leader of the Congress in Lok Sabha, said the bill allows excessive government interference in the functioning, control and management of waqf and waqf properties in the country. "...This has a detrimental impact on the community as well as the institution of the autonomy, which are necessary to administer the institution," he said.
In his dissent note, DMK member A Raja said the proviso of 'waqf by user' existed since the time of Prophet Mohammad and any move for its omission would violate the fundamental rights of the Muslim community.