The judge hearing Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's bail petition extended his judicial custody till July 3. On Wednesday, he was produced before the court through video conference on expiry of his judicial custody granted earlier. The counsel appearing for Kejriwal opposed the ED's application seeking extension of his judicial custody, saying there were no grounds to justify his continued incarceration.
Opposing the bail application of Kejriwal, the Enforcement Directorate on Wednesday claimed that Kejriwal demanded `100 crore bribe from the South Group for his party in a money laundering case linked to the alleged excise scam. The ED told the court that if AAP, which has been arrayed as an accused in the case, the person in charge of the party will be held culpable.
The ED told the court that when former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia was made an accused in the case, the AAP was not named as an accused. "Kejriwal demanded bribe. He asked for bribe of `100 crore. Kejriwal asked for funds for the AAP. Kejriwal demanded kickbacks from South Group. You can't say he is not guilty of offence. If AAP commits a crime, then every person in charge of the party will be deemed to be guilty," the ED told Special Judge Niyay Bindu.
"Now AAP has been made an accused. Kejriwal is responsible for the conduct (of the party)," it added. Kejriwal is the National Convenor of AAP.
During the arguments on his bail application, Kejriwal's counsel told the court that the entire case against him rested upon statements. "The statements are of those who have confessed themselves to be guilty. They are not saints here. They are those who are not only tainted but it appears that some were arrested and were given a promise of bail and promise of being granted pardon. Approvers. And there is another category who have not been arrested," the counsel said.
According to the ED and the CBI, the South Group is a cartel of politicians, business people and others who lobbied for liquor licences for which they paid bribe to the Delhi's ruling party. Kejriwal's lawyer claimed there were contradictions in the statements made by several co-accused.
"I won't be surprised if another statement is recorded to fill the lacunae. This is the process they follow. The investigations are always unending. Whenever they want they implicate anyone. This is the biggest instrument of oppression," he added.
The ED opposed Kejriwal's application, asserting, "The requirement is not that you don't have (criminal) antecedents."
"…that I hold a constitutional post is not relevant for grant of bail under PMLA. It may be an additional factor for refusing bail but the only factor which is relevant is whether he is guilty," the ED counsel said. Refuting Kejriwal's argument that the only evidence the ED had got against him was "approvers' statements", the central agency said when it becomes difficult to secure evidence, approvers are made.
"The law recognises it. You can't say there is inducement...So, it is what the law says," it said. The fact that the offence of money laundering has been committed is beyond doubt because the court has taken cognisance and it has not been challenged, it added.
"Co-accused Vijay Nair was media coordinator of AAP. He was coordinating. He used to hold meetings with those interested in liquor policy, the wholesalers. We have evidence that he was very close to Kejriwal.
"Demand (for bribe) is established. The money has gone to Goa. It has gone to hawala dealers. We have recorded statements. Larger chunk of amount was paid in cash is also established. The entire trail has been established," the ED asserted while opposing Kejriwal's bail petition.
