Street vendors who are a societal necessity have a fundamental right to vend or hawk but it comes with certain restrictions and it has to be balanced with others' rights, the Delhi High Court Friday said.
The high court said a large section of society depends on hawkers to buy fruits, vegetables, clothes and other household items but this does not mean that they can be allowed to affect the rights of others and that the city cannot be held ransom.
"Every fundamental right comes with certain restrictions. Vendors have a fundamental right to vend but it has to be balanced with others' rights. The issue is where is the fulcrum, where is the balance. Vendors are a necessity in society. We also go and buy vegetables from them,” a bench of Justices Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh said. The court's observation came while hearing the Centre's submission on a batch of pleas challenging the validity of the Street Vendors Act, its implementation, certain provisions of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Scheme, 2019 and other connected issues raised by various market associations and vendors and hawkers.
The Centre opposed the pleas by various market associations challenging the vires of the Street Vendors Act and said the petitions were “clearly misconceived and deserve to be rejected”.
“The present petition having been filed by various associations of traders and shopkeepers on the principal ground of violation of their rights and entitlements under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution would otherwise be not maintainable in terms of the admitted settled