Varun Thakur, father of seven-year-old Pradyuman, is unable to believe that prime suspect bus conductor Ashok Kumar murdered his son alone. Thakur believes that there were others involved in the murder of his son, whom he had dropped to the school on the fateful morning of September 8.
A native of Madhubani district in Bihar, Varun Thakur has waged a legal battle to get justice for his slain son.
Thakur says that murder is not that simple as the local police would have them believe. “My son was murdered in a pre-meditated manner and I am not willing to accept the police theory. It appears to be part of well written script. The killer already had a knife and he visited the children’s toilet which he shouldn’t have. What is more surprising that the killer left the murder weapon at the crime scene”, he said.
“How come he was moving around in the school premises with such a large knifeIJ Then, the grille of the bathroom window was also found to have been cut... and now the conductor is changing his statements. Don’t all these point to a conspiracy,” he wondered.
Thakur further said, “If the conductor was scared that he had been seen indulging in an illicit act by the boy and everybody would come to know about it, didn’t he think about the consequences of committing a murderIJ Didn’t he think that he could be hanged for thisIJ Also, if Ashok Kumar is the killer, then why didn’t he flee after killing PradyumanIJ”
Asked if the murder could be an act of revenge killing, he ruled out the possibility, saying he did not have any enmity as such.
Following the incident, several employees of the school are on the police radar, including Anju Dudeja, the in-charge of junior section of the school. However, Thakur did not speak much against her, other than that even her role in the whole affair was not satisfactory.
On the possible involvement of others in the incident, he said, “I am sure that some more people are involved (in the killing). As we saw the school was trying to sweep the matter under the carpet and even police were dilly-dallying, we decided to approach the Supreme Court.”
Blaming the school authorities’ casual approach towards safety of children for the tragedy, Thakur said: “I would drop my son at the school everyday. How on earth I could have even thought that one day he would be murdered in his school!”
Despite being emotionally torn due to the killing of his son, he is leaving no stone unturned to ensure that not only Pradyuman gets justice but also that no other child undergoes what his child had to. He wants a much harsher law to ward off any possibility of recurrence of such incidents.
“There is a need to replace the age-old rusted laws with new, more stringent ones, so that those with criminal mindset think twice before committing a crime. Besides, there is also an urgent need to prepare a much tougher guideline for the schools, so that school managements are not able to shrug off their responsibilities.”
Thakur does not want a new law to be named after his son; all he wants is that children across the country feel safe at least in the “temples of education”.