Govt nixes l-G's view on appointments

Govt nixes l-G's view on appointments
Published on: 

Overruling lieutenant-Governor Najeeb Jung’s views on appointment of three ‘Advocates on Record’ and 12 Arguing Counsel to represent the Delhi Government in the Supreme Court, Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia has gone ahead with the appointments, saying that any interference in the matter would be against the provisions of the Constitution.

In a recent notification issued to this effect by Deputy Secretary (law, Justice and legislative Assembly) Mani Bhushn Malhotra, said the State administration was pleased to appoint the Advocates on Record and Arguing Counsel for arguing panel for the Supreme Court  in relation to any suit, writ petition, appeal or other proceedings  by or against the NCT of Delhi in relation to  the Government or  its officers whose defence has been undertaken by it.

The Advocates on Record appointed  by the  Government are  Chirag M Shroff, Atul Kumar  and Jagit Singh Chhabra and  the ones for Arguing Panel are Siddhartha Dave, Manav Gupta, Kuldip Singh, Amarjit Singh Bedi, Gurmeher Singh Sistani, Yashvardhhan, Sunil Sharma, Karuna Nundy, Aishwarya Rao, Naveen R Nath, Niraj Gupta  and Charu Walikhanna.

Sources said Aam Admi Party (AAP)-led Government was averse to hire  advocates appointed  by the Central Government to defend its interests in the  Supreme Court. “Since we need to look after the  interests  of Delhi, we would like  the best of advocates  from the  city to represent us in the  apex court,” a senior official told The Pioneer.

So far, the  advocates representing  the Delhi Government in the apex court  were appointed only by the  Centre.

But soon after the AAP Government appointed  its 15  Advocates  for the Supreme Court,  Raj Niwas  wrote  to the Joint Secretary (UT) that it should nullify these appointments. But the Union Home Ministry  has reportedly not responded to the Raj Niwas communication so far.

In a signed note, Sisodia said  he was of the considered view  that any order made by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) interfering with the appointments  made by the elected Government of Delhi  would be against the provisions of the Constitution of India. He said the AAP Government  was fully competent  and well within  its powers  to appoint  advocates to defend  its interests  in the Supreme Court.  He said the Government had also appointed its counsel in the  Delhi High Court  and similar  appointments  cannot by any stretch of imagination be considered  contrary to any law.

Sisodia further said  in any case there was no specific  law or statute  which lays down  that only  the Ministry  of law and Justice  of the  Union Government acting through  Central law Agency can appoint  advocates to represent  the interests of the  Delhi Government in the apex court. He said Raj Niwas letter  to JS (UT) seeking to nullify the appointment of the Advocates  for the  Supreme Court  too has not elicited  any response from the MHA so far.

The Deputy Chief Minister said at the  time  of the  issuing of the  first order, consent of  all the 15 Advocates  had not been received. “Now the consent of all the Advocates  has been received, therefore it is required  that the  appointment  made by the  order dated 11-12-2015 are notified  in the gazette. Since  the Principal Secretary (law)  is on leave,  Additional Secretary (law)  may ensure  the said  appointments are notified.” 

Daily Pioneer
dailypioneer.com