Ads contract: Dikshit gets lokayukta's clean chit

Published on: 

The lokayukta has given a clean chit to former Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit in a case of alleged “bypassing” of regulations and granting of “undue favours” to a private firm in handling Government advertisements.

The complainant, Ashok Kumar, had alleged that the Congress leader had caused a loss of Rs 73.28 lakh to the exchequer by allegedly bending rules to extend benefits to Ved Pahuja and Associates. The order, dated July 25, came nearly two weeks after Dikshit was appointed as the Congress’ chief ministerial candidate in Uttar Pradesh.

The complaint said the firm was appointed as consultants and engaged for all outdoor publicity despite it not being empanelled by the Directorate of Information and Publicity (DIP) or the Directorate of Advertising and Visual Publicity (DAVP).

“The forum observed that no purpose would be served by protracting the present proceedings, in which the complainant himself is not willing to come forward to press the allegations...and, in which, in any event, the documents on record do not substantiate the case of the complainant and has chosen not to file an affidavit by way of evidence despite grant of about three years time to him and the document on record do not substantiate the case of the complainant,” the order issued by lokayukta Justice Reva Khetrapal said.

“Finally, it was submitted that there is not an iota of evidence on record to connect the respondent (Sheila Dikshit) with any kind of corruption, abuse of power, misdoing,” the order said.

The order said that following Kumar’’s plea for a detailed inquiry through an independent agency to ascertain the actual loss to the exchequer, a notice was issued to Dikshit on February 12, 2013.

“Perusal of the records, however, shows that the complainant has filed no evidence to substantiate his aforesaid allegations,” the order said.

Amicus curiae, appointed at a later stage in the case, also conceded before the forum that there was nothing on record to bring home the allegation of culpability against the respondent. 

Daily Pioneer
dailypioneer.com