Delhi

Delhi lawyers' grievances addressed

Staff Reporter

Delhi lawyers’ strike over the demand of expeditious disposal of High Court (Amendment Bill), 2015 may end after Parliament on Wednesday passed the Bill. The development will reduce the workload on the Delhi High Court by enhancing the pecuniary jurisdiction of civil suits from the existing Rs20 lakh to Rs2 crore.

The Delhi High Court (Amendment Bill), 2015, earlier passed by the Rajya Sabha, was adopted by a voice vote by the lower House in the absence of most of the Opposition members who boycotted proceedings to protest the suspension of 25 Congress members for five days by the Speaker.

Once implemented, the measure would allow transferring of civil suits, valued up to Rs2 crore, to the nine district courts in Delhi from the High Court. The Bill was introduced by the UPA Government in the Rajya Sabha in February 2014 and referred to the Standing Committee on law and Personnel, which cleared it.

The NDA Government approved the measure without any changes and the measure was passed by the Upper House in the Budget Session. Replying to the debate on the Bill, law Minister DV Sadananda Gowda said the measure would considerably reduce the workload of the Delhi High Court.

“People staying in far-flung areas will also get relief as they won’t have to come to the High Court. Currently, 11 district courts (in Delhi) are assigned to deal with the cases, but three more district courts will be added to the list,” he said. When South Delhi MP Ramesh Bidhuri sought increasing the cap to Rs5 crore because of the growth in property rates, Gowda said the enhancement of the pecuniary jurisdiction was done with due consultations with the Bar Association of Delhi and a resolution by the High Court.

“When time comes, it can be enhanced in future”, the Minister said. lower court lawyers in Delhi have been on an indefinite strike since July 21 till date demanding expeditious passage of the Bill, while those of the High Court were on strike for about six days from July 22 opposing the measure.

Responding to the issue of pendency of cases, Gowda said some 3.6 crore cases were pending in courts, ranging from the Supreme Court to subordinate courts.

The Government has taken steps like appointing more judges and creating additional infrastructure to clear the backlog, the Minister said. At present, cases involving even a small property are required to be filed before the High Court as it has the jurisdiction of civil suits involving Rs20 lakh and above.

The statement of objects and reasons of the Bill said “this has increased the workload of the Delhi High Court. The poor people living in Delhi also have to cover considerable distance to approach the Delhi High Court to seek justice in their cases.”

Since there are so many district courts, it is easier for the litigants to approach them and the cost of litigation is also less there, it said.

“The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi has considered the request of the Bar Associations of Delhi and requested the Central Government for enhancement of pecuniary jurisdiction of ordinary original jurisdiction of the High Court of Delhi from the existing Rs20 lakh to Rs2 crore,” the statement said. The move to amend the Delhi High Court Act comes in the wake of a recommendation made by former Delhi High Court Chief Justice D Murugesan in 2013.