After Union Minister Dharmendra Pradhan wrote to the Centre regarding farmers claiming low insurance payout due to alleged malpractices in Bargarh district, Union Minister of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Narendra Singh Tomar has written to the State Government stating that the Government of India has taken prompt action in this regard after the matter was first brought up a few months back.
Tomar, however, has raised questions on the Odisha Government’s handling of the issue. In a letter to Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik on Wednesday, he wrote that many farmers in drought-affected areas are yet to get their insurance dues.
He informed that that the Centre had introduced Revamped Operational Guidelines (ROG) from Kharif-2020 to ensure that farmers get eligible claims in a timely manner. Each stakeholder’s roles and responsibilities had been defined in a clear manner including floating bids for the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY), allocating cluster of districts to Insurance Companies (ICs) and agreement of premium rates which vests with the State Government. It was further decided that the responsibility of conducting transparent Crop Cutting Experiments (CCE) through the CCE app also rests with the State Government.
A well-defined procedure was also put in place to resolve yield data disputes wherein a State-level Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was provisioned so that the dispute is first settled at the State level. The case would be brought before the Central TAC only in case of non-resolution at the first level.
The letter also mentioned that the issue of disputed claims of Kharif-21 in some insurance units in Odisha was first brought to GoI’s notice by the State Government in July this year. The GoI advised the State Government to follow the due procedure and was informed that cases of some insurance units were resolved at the STAC level, but remaining 189 cases were unresolved and filed for higher appeal before the Central-level TAC.
“The GoI had taken prompt action and advised State authorities to get it examined by STAC since it was observed that the STAC was not constituted by the State despite it being part of the guidelines since 2020. Also the GoI put up the matter before the TAC as soon as the appeals against STAC order were received and the matter was taken to its logical conclusion,” Tomar wrote, further informing that after due follow-up, a majority of claims in disputed districts have been settled at the TAC and complete settlement is expected by this week. Out of nine disputed districts, Rs 723 crore is the total payable claim, out of which Rs 622 crore has been settled.