Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh’s recent call to ban Sikhs for Justice underscores a growing consensus within the Indian establishment that foreign-backed elements are actively working to destabilise the country’s internal social fabric. His statement is not a reaction to isolated incidents but a recognition of a broader, orchestrated effort to exploit India’s challenges for geopolitical leverage. At the heart of this manipulation lies the Open Society Foundations (OSF), led by George Soros, which has been systematically influencing India’s internal affairs through financial backing, ideological infiltration, and political maneuvering.
The farmer unrest in India over recent years is not merely a reaction to domestic policy, it is closely linked to Soros’s global network, which exploits social fault lines to exert influence and undermine sovereign decision-making.
Indian agriculture has undergone a transformation with direct government support and market interventions, yet the farmer protests are increasingly entangled in international financing and hidden political agendas. What started as grassroots struggles for farmers’ rights have been infiltrated by foreign forces with interests far beyond agriculture.
Historically, Indian farmers have fought for better prices, market access, and protection from exploitative policies. Their movements have centered on resisting corporate encroachment and demanding fair subsidies.
However, recent years have seen a shift where external funding has played a role in redirecting these movements. OSF has strategically injected capital into India’s rural protests, not to empower farmers but to destabilise internal governance and promote an agenda aligning with Western geopolitical interests.
The 2020-21 farmers’ protests exemplify how Soros’s network infiltrates domestic movements. What started as a call for fair pricing quickly evolved into a sophisticated and well-funded political movement, backed by global media campaigns and international endorsements.
This escalation was not organic-it was engineered. OSF-linked entities have funneled funds into Indian non-profits and activist groups under the pretext of supporting democracy and human rights, but the real intent was to use these protests as a tool against the Indian state.
Financial backing from international sources raises concerns about whether genuine farmer grievances are being amplified or manipulated. Soros’s OSF, known for its involvement in “regime change” operations across Eastern Europe and Latin America, has been accused of funding civil unrest in developing nations. Similar patterns have emerged in India. The well-organised nature of the farmer protests, from logistics to media coordination, suggests significant financial and strategic backing. The question remains: Why are these protests so well-funded, and what is the ultimate objective?
The consequences of such interference are multifaceted. While real farmer issues persist, external involvement risks overshadowing them with hidden political motives.
The movement, originally meant to empower farmers, risks becoming a tool for destabilisation. What began as a struggle for fair Minimum Support Prices (MSP) has transformed into a political agitation aimed at discrediting the Indian government and fracturing social cohesion.
The farmer protests received significant support from Canadian politicians, particularly in areas with a large Punjabi diaspora. Public endorsements, fundraising campaigns, and rallies abroad highlighted how a local agricultural movement turned into an international diplomatic issue. Canada’s Liberal Party, influenced by OSF-backed think tanks and lobbying groups, played a key role in amplifying the protests. Radical elements with foreign funding further intensified tensions, raising doubts about the protests’ true motives.
The Sovereign Guarantee Fund (SGF) is another financial mechanism under scrutiny. Designed to provide security for agricultural projects, it has drawn concerns that foreign governments and financial institutions may be using it to influence farmer movements and shape internal policies. Soros’s network has been linked to sovereign funds in various developing countries, often tying them to policy shifts favoring Western financial interests over local farmers. This creates economic dependencies that align with Western strategic goals rather than the welfare of Indian farmers.
Soros’s network has been linked to sovereign funds in various developing countries, often tying them to policy shifts favoring Western financial interests over local farmers. This creates economic dependencies that align with Western strategic goals rather than the welfare of Indian farmers.
For Indian farmers, this situation presents both opportunities and risks. While they demand fair prices and financial aid, there is a danger of being drawn into international power struggles.
The growing influence of foreign-backed transnational corporations (TNCs) is particularly alarming. These firms, often supported by sovereign guarantee agreements, introduce patented farming solutions that increase dependency, eroding farmers’ autonomy.
What is presented as modernisation frequently results in escalating costs for farmers, reducing their control over their own practices.
The fingerprints of OSF are evident across these movements-international media coverage, coordinated social media campaigns, and well-timed statements from Western governments align with Soros’s strategy of influencing emerging markets.
The influx of foreign-backed corporations undermines domestic agricultural enterprises, shifting control from Indian farmers to multinational conglomerates. Small farmers, in particular, bear the brunt of rising input costs and decreasing market power.
This is not about democracy or civil rights—it is about strategic geopolitical manipulation. The objective is clear: to weaken India’s internal social cohesion, influence policymaking, and create economic dependencies that serve Western interests.
The increasing presence of foreign-backed elements in India’s farmer movements is no accident, it is a calculated strategy to erode India’s sovereignty and dictate internal policies.
At the core of these complexities is a fundamental truth-Indian farmers require genuine policy support, direct financial aid, and reforms that prioritize their interests over corporate or geopolitical agendas.
Their protests should not be battlegrounds for international diplomacy but platforms for real agricultural change. India’s agricultural sector must remain sovereign, with policies driven by national interests rather than foreign capital.
As Rajnath Singh’s statement suggests, the time for vigilance is now. The Indian government must safeguard its agricultural sector from external influences and hidden financial agendas. Protecting Indian farmers is not just about agriculture-it is about preserving national sovereignty, dignity, and economic independence. The future of Indian farming must not be dictated by foreign interests but shaped by the resilience and determination of India’s farmers.
Their fight is not just for today-it is for the generations that will inherit their land, knowledge, and legacy. Ensuring a self-reliant agricultural sector is essential to achieving the vision of a Viksit Bharat by 2047.
India’s farmers deserve genuine support, not foreign interference. The influence of external forces threatens national sovereignty, turning rightful protests into geopolitical tools.
As Rajnath Singh warns, vigilance is crucial. India must protect its agricultural sector from hidden agendas, ensuring that policies prioritise farmers’ welfare over external manipulation, securing a self-reliant future.
(The writer is secretary general, Confederation of NGOs of Rural India and Member, PM-MSP Committee, Government of India. Views expressed are personal)
