The lost battle for the conservation of Hanguls or Kashmir stags may receive a boost after the recent meeting of State Wild life Board (SWlB) of Kashmir consented to shift the sheep farm from Dachigam National Park (DNP) in the State, which is the traditional habitat of this endangered species. The experts, however, expressed apprehensions on how soon the decision will actually be implemented.
The Pioneer had earlier reported on the alarming impact of sheep farm of the State Animal Husbandry Department within 141 sq. km of the National Park since 1961. The presence of such a farm within a National Park is in contravention to Jammu and Kashmir Wildlife Protection Act 1978. “There is at least some hope after the meeting, considering that this meeting was headed by the Chief Minister himself,” said MK Ranjitsinh, member of SWlB. He is also the Chairman of the Special Committee constituted by the Environment Ministry for recovery of Hanguls.
However, what is important is that this shifting has to happen before winter, otherwise one year will get wasted again, said Ranjitsinh. The Hanguls descend to the lower flat terrains of the National Park in winter to forage for food. Hence, till then, the fencing has to be removed and their habitat cleared of sheep grazing, he added.
The sources, however, pointed to the real side of the story. “The main hurdle lies in the fact that there are certain establishments on the lower terrains of the park that are occupied by the employees of the State Animal Husbandry Department. They are believed to enjoy strong clout and it is not likely that they will vacate the premises easily,” the sources said. These buildings are originally under the jurisdiction of the State Wildlife Department; hence, with the shifting of the sheep farm, these constructions should also be handed back to the Wild life Department, added sources.
The issue of commitment by SWlB is not new; the same situation arose during the meeting held on February 3 last year. The members had not only decided on shifting the sheep farm, but had even set the deadline for May 2012. More importantly, even the State Cabinet had taken a similar decision way back in 2005. But, the decision continues to hang in balance even today. “Hence, the issue is not simply agreeing on shifting out, but how soonIJ” they questioned.