Delhi HC declines plea for FIR, probe against Justice Varma
The Delhi High Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea seeking the registration of an FIR and a probe by an SIT or CBI into the purported discovery of huge stash of cash following a fire at the residence of former Delhi High Court judge Yashwant Varma.
Terming the petition a “wild witch hunt”, Justice Amit Bansal remarked that the petitioner, lawyer Ghanshyam Upadhyay, has alternative remedies in law.
“I’m not entertaining this. This is a wild witch hunt. You have nothing better to do?” the judge observed.
During the hearing, the court questioned the locus of the petitioner and asked why he did not approach the trial court with his plea for an FIR.
The petitioner submitted that the incident was “extraordinary” in nature and the lower court “can’t do justice to the matter”. “This is regarding justice Yashwant Varma. Criminal law can be set into motion by anyone. There is no embargo,” he further explained.
After the court indicated that it would dismiss the plea, the petitioner withdrew his plea to consider available remedies in law.
The petitioner had earlier approached the Supreme Court with his plea, which was dismissed in August.
The purported discovery of a huge stash of cash took place after a fire broke out at the Lutyens’ Delhi residence of Varma, then a Delhi High Court judge, around 11:35 pm on the night of Holi on March 14, 2025, prompting the fire department personnel to rush to the spot and douse the flames.
The cash discovery triggered a major controversy and he was then transferred to Allahabad High Court, his parent high court.
Varma, who was facing impeachment proceedings, resigned this year on April 9. The judge submitted his resignation in a letter to President Droupadi Murmu.
The rare removal proceedings initiated by the Lok Sabha against Justice Varma was rendered “infructuous” following his resignation. The judge was due to superannuate on January 5, 2031.
