This refers to the article, “Evolution of the ERP test” (May 6) by Namit Saxena. Rightly, the shift of interpretation from whether a practice is “essentially religious” to whether it is “essential to the religion”, has led to confusion. While the latter requires a text that defines religion and its god, the Sanatan Dharma does not require god, dharmis are free to decide their creator, and an atheist can be a dharmi too. Judges have arrogated papal rights to themselves, and want to convertdharma to Abrahamism. They have re-written the Constitution even more blatantly in their interpretation of ‘secularism’.