In a relief for Salman Khan, a trial court on Wednesday acquitted the Bollywood star of all charges in the Arms Act case in the alleged poaching of two Black Bucks 18 years ago, holding that the prosecution permission given by the district administration was a “mindless move”.
In a 102-page long order, the Chief Judicial Magistrate Dalpat Singh Rajpurohit ruled that possession and use of fire arms with expired license by Salman could not be proved by the prosecution.
The 51-year-old Salman was present in the court along with his sister Alvira.
After his acquittal, Salman took to Twitter to thank his fans for their good wishes and prayers. “Thank you for all the support and good wishes,” he tweeted.
According to the prosecution, Salman Khan was alleged to have kept and used the fire arms with expired license during poaching of two Black Bucks in village Kankani near Jodhpur in Rajasthan on October 1-2, 1998.
“The prosecution permission by the (then) District Magistrate (Rajat Kumar Mishra) was given without applying mind and was non-speaking and non-regent,” the court said, adding that Salman had to suffer for this unnecessarily.
The order said that the license of Salman’s arms in question was valid for three years till 8/8/99 and at the time of alleged poaching, it was just not renewed, which did not mean, it was expired.
“For this condition, the license holder should submit his arms with the police, failing which, he should be prosecuted under Section 21 of Arms Act instead of Sections 3/25 and 27."
The court clearly ruled that Salman’s license was not expired during the poaching as argued by the prosecution counsel but it was just not renewed.
The court also said that it was only the license, which was invalid then, not his arms, and therefore he could not be prosecuted under Section 3 but 21 of Arms Act, which was not the case here.