“Because, Parliament lacks the competence and authority to pass the impugned resolutions condemning the act of the petitioner, who is a private person…Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 (Parliament) are not competent to take cognizance of the expressions of free speech of the private person like the petitioner, as the power under Rule 171 of the lok Sabha Rules provides that the resolution must relate to act of Government. Thus the Impugned Resolution do not fulfill the jurisdictional requirement, and the necessary jurisdictional facts are lacking,” the petition said.