Rajya Sabha Chairman Hamid Ansari on Friday rejected the Breach of Privilege notices given by Congress members over the “leakage” of Railway Budget details to a section of media.
While the Congress members cried foul over “leakage” of Railway Budget and demanded action, Ansari in his ruling said that the matter needs to be looked into to ascertain if norms of official secrecy were infringed upon but rejected Breach of Privilege notices. Amid ruckus, Parliamentary Affairs Minister M Venkaiah Naidu told the House that Government will take action taking cue from what has been done in such instances earlier. Ansari mentioned that he had received notices of Breach of Privilege from six members alleging leakage of Railway Budget. He said the matter was also raised by the members in the House on July 8, the day Railway Budget was presented. The privilege notices were given by Madhusudan Mistry, V Hanumantha Rao, Shantaram Naik, Rajani Patil, Praveen Rashtrapal and Ashk Ali Tak.
Ansari said he examined the notices on the basis of the case, materials placed on record and the past precedents. “It is a fact that some of the proposals of the Government which found place in the Railway Minister’s Budget Speech were indeed reported” by a newspaper in its issue of July 8, the day on which the Budget was presented. It is unfortunate that contents of the Budget Speech of the Railway Minister were reported in the media. This needs to be looked into by the Government to ascertain if norms of official secrecy were infringed,” Ansari said.
He further said there are several instances in the past wherein the presiding officers have observed that the leakage of Budget proposal does not constitute a Breach of Privilege. “I have no reasons to differ with these rulings of the past. Accordingly, I hold that these notices are not admissible,” the Chairman said triggering uproar.
The Opposition wanted to know what action the Government was going to take in the unfortunate leakage. Naidu told the House, “Government will respect advise and direction of the Chair. I will ask that the issue should be examined...I have been told that such instances took place earlier and we will see what action had been taken. Based on it action will be taken.”
Congress member Satyavrat Chaturvedi said the matter is very serious and wanted to know what action the Government would be taking. “The Chairman, based on available evidences has found that certain portions were leaked,” he said, not heeding to Deputy Chairman PJ Kurien’s pleas that “after Chairman’s ruling the issue is over.”
His party colleague Rajeev Shukla said, “Certain points have appeared in the newspaper. Crime has been committed. This matter is serious. We need some kind of direction from the Government.”