Soon after the Opposition members of Jammu and Kashmir on Monday called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the Kashmir crisis, the Congress alleged that the Centre is not serious enough in solving the over a month long crisis that has victimised the people of valley.
Stating that Government is not clear on the agenda with whom the Prime Minister wants to have a dialogue, Congress dismissed as “shooting from the hip” the Prime Minister’s call for a dialogue to find a lasting solution to the unrest in Kashmir Valley
“It looks that the Prime Minister’s words keep changing. What he said at the all-party meeting, his remarks in the Independence Day address and today he is talking of dialogue, but dialogue with whomIJ There is a suspicion that these are mere words, mere empty rhetoric for the Prime Minister. He is unfortunately shooting from his hip and merely shooting the breeze,” AICC spokesman Manish Tewari said.
‘When you talk of a dialogue, to talk to people who are estranged from you. You do not talk to such people who are with you and are part of the mainstream,” said the former Information and Broadcasting Minister.
Tewari said that Finance Minister Arun Jaitley’s assertions that those indulging in stone-pelting in Kashmir are “not satyagrahis but aggressors” showed that he and the Prime Minister are not on the same page. He also claimed that several Union Ministers are also speaking in different voices.
“The essence of the Finance Minister’s statement is that there is no political problem in Jammu and Kashmir,” he said, adding that Jaitley’s comments implied that he felt there was no need for dialogue.
Asked whether Congress favoured talking to the Hurriyat, he suggested that the first learning of a spokesman was not to answer hypothetical questions. Noting that Congress is concerned over “irresponsible” handing of issues relating to national security, Tewari said that the party is willing to offer constructive suggestions if the Government approached it and have a “cohesive approach”.
He said that the Prime Minister has been using three words “insaniyat, jamhooriyat and Kashmiriyat” for the past two years, but “we doubt if the Prime Minister understands the essence of these three concepts in entirety”.
“What does Kashmiriyat mean to the PMIJ How does he include it in his policiesIJ Are there, indeed, any policies on theseIJ What does he mean by jamhooriyatIJ Parties have been contesting election for decades in J&K,” he said.
He also asked as to what is the Prime Minister’s definition of “insaniyat”. “Is insaniyat used as a balm for those harmed in this sensitive timeIJ”