The ongoing Budget Session of the Karnataka Assembly witnessed a major debate on restricting permissiveness of the media. Cutting across party lines the legislators vent their anger against the aggressive media and called for restricting its limits which is going beyond limits.
In one of its rarest debate in the recent times the lawmakers irked by the media aggressiveness want to control its scope which intruding their privacy. After the fiery debate, Assembly Speaker KB Koliwad announced that a House committee would be formed soon to restrict “permissiveness” of the media, which came in the line of fire from members of all parties.
Working of the media, especially the visual, came under intense scrutiny of legislators during the debate initiated by senior member BR Patil of the Karnataka Janatha Paksha. In fact a legislator used objectionable words against media persons, which was expunged by the Speaker KB Koliwad.
The legislators from all parties took part in the debate and vocal in saying that media was telecasting reports that are derogatory in nature and tarnishing the image of legislators. They also raised their concerns by narrating personal “bitter” incidents with the media. Accusing media of working with “permissiveness”, the members called for restrictions on it.
Initiating the discussion R Patil alleged that the visual media was unnecessarily indulging in character assassination of politicians without any facts or truth behind their reports. Calling it an attempt to portray them in bad light before the public, he said some reports were so personal that “it spoils peace in one’s family.” “It has now become a matter of prestige of the house and its members,” he added.
Stressing on the need for restrictions on the media for the sake of quality, KS Puttannaiah (Ind) said “please don’t indulge in character assassination.”
“loose language is used very often. They call Yeddyurappa (BJP state President) as Yeddy, Siddaramaiah (Chief Minister) as Siddu. Who gave them this rightIJ” he asked.
Speaking at the end of the over four hour long debate, Koliwad said it was the collective opinion of the House to form a committee.
He said “legislature has a long arm. It has powers. It is a collective opinion of this House that a House committee should be formed. We will give it 15 days time. Once it submits its report, based on the recommendations, we will decide whether any law is to be amended or a new law should be brought in so that the media functions within its limits.”
Even as the Speaker was making his remarks, Higher Education Minister Basavaraj Rayareddy suggested that legal aspects be looked into before forming the House Committee and deciding its terms of reference. He said freedom of speech and expression is a fundamental right and that members should see to it that they do not do anything that is against the Constitution.
Clarifying, Koliwad said the House committee would also function within the ambit of the Constitution. “We are aware of freedom of speech and press freedom, but it should not be freedom of permissiveness. With an intention to contain this permissiveness we are forming a House committee. Terms and references for the committee and its form will be decided shortly,” he added.
Several MlAs, mostly from Congress, joined by Ministers M B Patil, Vinay Kulkarni and Ramesh Jarkiholi objected to it, following which Rayareddy said he was only making a suggestion and would leave it to the wisdom of the House.