AAP has opposed One Nation One Election as anti-democratic and dangerous seating. The Law Commission had expressed opinion on the One Nation One Election proposal from the political parties. According to the proposal of One Nation One Election, the elections of the Center and the States should be held simultaneously. This proposal was placed before the Law Commission and in 2018 the Law Commission supported the proposal.
AAP leader Atishi said, “The Law Commission took opinion from all political parties and you have also given your opinion. It seems what is the harm every year. If all the elections are held together, but this deeply separates . , then many classical issues come to the fore. If One Nation One Election happens then India’s democracy will take a big blow. That’s why you have opposed One Nation One Election.”
AAP leader Atishi said, “In central and state elections, people vote on different issues. Those who have more resources will suppress the issues of the states.
Once elections are held, money power will influence the elections.” If a government falls in two years or a coalition government, elections cannot be held for the next 3 years. We saw this in Delhi. In 2013, the public gave a big victory after seeing the 49-day government.
If one When Nation One elections are held, the right to vote is taken away from the public.”
At the same time, Jasmin Shah said, “This proposal was analyzed with a more open mind. For 75 years we are seeing that democracy is being thrust upon our constitution. You cannot abolish the AMRUT framework. Deterministic system Bringing Presidency form of government by abolishing it. Babasaheb Ambedkar had said one thing.
He had said with claims that he wants to bring the tenure system, he will be accountable to the public every 5 years. It is necessary to make the government accountable, not to be steady”