In the 49-page ruling issued in Washington, US District Court Judge Amy Jackson said, "Given the tens of thousands of exceptions the Army has already made to its grooming and uniform policies, its successful accommodation of observant Sikhs in the past, and the fact that, at this time, plaintiff is seeking only to enrol in the ROTC programme, the Army's refusal to permit him to do so while adhering to his faith cannot survive the strict scrutiny that RFRA demands."