This raised expectations in Jammu — which were dashed the next day when the BJP and the PDP launched the programme for their coalition Government. The Agenda of Alliance said that the Aiims would be set up in Kashmir. This was reiterated by the Governor of Jammu & Kashmir and the Chief Minister, even as Dr Singh stood by his position. By this time, the situation was heating up already. There were two protest bandhs and the Aiims Coordination Committee — an umbrella organisation of 70 outfits — had come together to demand that the political establishment clear the air. This compelled Deputy Chief Minister Nirmal Singh and other senior leaders to give a written assurance on June 18 that they will obtain an appropriate order by July 20. They missed the deadline, prompting the Aiims Coordination Committee to call a three-day bandh that, this Sunday, was extended to August 5. In between, on July 30, the Union Minister for Health and Family Welfare suggested that two separate “Aiims-like” institutions be set up in Jammu and Srinagar. His plans were echoed by the State Health Minister who said that both institutions will receive equal funding and have separate management. Meant to soothe frayed nerves, these suggestions only added to the confusion. It isn't clear if the plan is to set up two Aiims in the State or split one. Most experts agree that the All India Institutes of Medical Sciences Act, following its 2012 amendment, allows for the setting up of two Aiims in one State.