Sunday, July 20, 2008   Updated: 03:53 am
   NEWS
   HOME
   CITY
   NATION
   STATES
   BUSINESS
   SPORTS
   ENTERTAINMENT
   WORLD
   EDIT PAGE
   OP-ED
   COLUMNISTS
   EDITOR'S MAIL
   SEARCH ARCHIVES
   STATE EDITIONS
   BHOPAL
   BHUBANESWAR
   KOCHI
   LUCKNOW
   CHANDIGARH
   DEHRADUN
   RANCHI
   FEATURES
   VIVACITY
   AVENUES
   BOOKS
   FORECAST
  SUNDAY PIONEER
   AGENDA
   FORAY
 
Click here to email your comments to the Editor.

Letters received on Sunday, July 20, 2008
 
Left does it yet again
This refers to Mr Chandan Mitra’s article, “Left out again” (Cutting Ed, Sunday Pioneer, July 6). Erudite as he is, the line quoted by him from Faiz Ahmed Faiz’s “Rageeb Se” are, however, not correct. The correct line is “hum ne is ishq main kya khoya hai kya seekha hai”.

One vividly recalls that when Mr Manmohan Singh was Finance Minister in the Narasimha Rao Government and rose to present his first Budget, the Leftists, led by Mr Somnath Chatterjee, stalled the proceedings of Parliament, alleging that the paragraphs in the Budget speech about structural reforms had been borrowed verbatim from World Bank documents. However, the Narasimha Rao regime, even though a minority Government, sailed through. The alleged charge of bribery with respect to the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha could not be sustained.

It is ironic that a similar situation faces the Congress today. The current UPA dispensation represented from its very inception an opportunist coalition with disparate outfits. The alliance with the Left was essentially a marriage of convenience. The Left kept dictating terms to the UPA and as a result economic reforms were repeatedly stalled. The withdrawal of the Left’s support has plunged the Government into a political crisis. Now it is shamelessly wooing all and sundry to muster the requisite number to stay in power.

RN Chawla
New Delhi

Not about energy independence
This refers to Mr Swapan Dasgupta’s article, “What if there is a free vote?” (Usual Suspects, Sunday Pioneer, July 13). Mr Dasgupta’s article is all very well but it still does not answer many questions. For example, once the India-US nuclear deal is signed, amendments have to be made to existing domestic legislation to permit private players to enter the nuclear energy sector. If this is one of the cornerstones of energy independence, why should this be based on signing a bilateral agreement? Shouldn’t the Government allow private players to enter the field irrespective of the 123 Agreement?

Also, wouldn’t this be an open admission that Government monopoly of the sector has not worked? Then again, whatever happened to the hype of thorium being the fuel of choice for India and all the talk about fast breeder reactors? Is there a failure on this front also?

R Rao
via e-mail

We don’t need this nuclear deal
Apropos the article, “A historic blunder” (Cutting Ed, Sunday Pioneer, July 13) I agree with Mr Chandan Mitra that for a Prime Minister, who is unlikely to be remembered appreciatively by future generations, thanks to four years of non-performance, such a move is understandable. Except remaining preoccupied with his single agenda of pushing through India-US nuclear deal, which only few comprehend, there has been no worthwhile contribution from him that a common man could remember. A common man knows less about nuclear technology as opposed to inflation.

Furthermore, there is no denying that the nuclear deal will make India a pawn in the hands of America and thus bring the country under perpetual bondage. Why should we support a deal, which purportedly needs the support of clandestine deals to run concurrent to it? The deal can in no way bode well for us.

JL Ganjoo
New Delhi

Don’t defame Islam
This is not the first time that I have picked up my pen to counter the filth that is repeatedly poured on Islam in Sunday Pioneer by columnists like Mr Kanchan Gupta and Mr NS Rajaram. Though historically speaking, Mr Rajaram’s article, “Revisiting Islam” (July 6) was complete rubbish, what disappointed me the most was the ignorant and criminal misquotation of two verses from the Quran.

If the author has himself read the Quran and not only those verses excerpted in Sunday Pioneer and in Mr Arun Shourie’s articles, then I request him to publish the five verses preceeding and following the first quoted verse. Only when the concerned verses are read in their entirety that readers will truly understand the context of war the verses speak of.

As far as maintaining a large and powerful army is concerned, I do expect, as everybody else does, that the Indian Army will be strong enough to strike terror in the hearts of the Chinese, Pakistani, Sri Lankan, Bangladeshi and even the American Governments so that they dare not dream of attacking us. Does that make me a terrorist? Please think before you publish such articles.

Yassir Khan
Hindu College, Delhi

Click here to email your comments to the Editor.

Check Editor's Mailbox:
/ /

 

Search Today Archives
 
// 
 
Web dailypioneer.com
iocl.com petrotech2007.com
 
 







 
 
Is UPA indulging in horse-trading ahead of the trust vote ?
 
Yes
No
Can't say
Previous Polls




© CMYK Multimedia Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
To access reprinting rights please contact Pioneer Syndication Services at info@dailypioneer.com.
For comments and feedback, please mail us at feedback@dailypioneer.com